Integrating English with total physical response for pre-schoolers’ cognitive development (IR)

Govindan Nair Krishnavani Anmal, Nachiappan Suppiah, Wong Kung Teck,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	LB Theory and practice of education
ISSN :	2232-0458
Main Author :	Govindan Nair Krishnavani Anmal, Nachiappan Suppiah, Wong Kung Teck,
Title :	Integrating English with total physical response for pre-schoolers’ cognitive development (IR)

Place of Production :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :	2017
PDF Full Text :	Login required to access this item.

Full Text :

This study explores the integration of English with Total Physical Response (TPR) for pre-schoolers’ cognitive development. Research was built upon, review of cognitive developmental theorists, stakeholders, teachers’ feedback and experience. Five TPR related lesson plans are specially created and vetted by experts in order to collect data related to young learners' cognitive development with the integration of English with TPR. This study employs a naturalistic observational methodology. The researchers conducted observation, attentive listening and tool field notes concurrently. A structured reflective note from the researchers is also used for analyses. The observation procedure seeks to record descriptive details about cognitive processes, ambience, and social activities among preschoolers. The findings indicate that there is improvement in language progressions, observable cognitive output with the ability to think, questioning skill, justifying thoughts and opinions and higher interest in learning through TPR. Therefore it is concluded that by integrating English with TPR, pre-school educators can maximize the output of their teaching.

References

1. Armstrong, T. (2006). The best schools: How human development research should inform educational practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 2. Asher, J. J. (1977). Leaning another language through actions. The complete teacher’s guidebook. CA; Sky Oaks. 3. Beitz, K. (2012). The relationship between learning and cognitive development in young children. Bright Hub Inc. Retrieved from www.brighthub.com/education 4. Bergen, D. (2002). The role of pretend play in children’s cognitive development. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 4, 1-12. 5. Bruner, J. S. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. NY: Norton. 6. Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Frenchs Forest, New South Wales. 7. Bushnell, E., & Boudreau, J. (1993). Motor development and the mind: The potential role of motor abilities as a determinant of aspects of perceptual development. Child Development, 64, 1005-1021. 8. Carl, Z. (2009). Discover magazine. Is the right side of our brain really more creative than the left? London, UK. century. New York: Basic Books. 9. Golinkoff, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Eyer, D. (2004). Einstein never used flashcards: How our children really learn--and why they need to play more and memorize less. New York: Rodale Books. 10. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J., (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-27. 11. Kearsley, G. (1994). Explorations in learning & instruction: The theory into practice database. Jacksonville State University Encyclopedia of Psychology. 12. Krashen, S. (2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. 13. Leedy, P. D. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 14. Mahendran, M. (2010). The influence of first language grammar (L1) on the English language (L2) writing of Tamil School students: A case study from Malaysia, (Doctoral dissertation). Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia. 15. McLeod, S. A. (2007). Bruner. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org./bruner.html. 16. Mills, G. E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ; Prentice Hall. 17. Nachiappan, S. (2012). Aplikasi kognisi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran di prasekolah melalui analisis pedagogi hermeneutik. Jurnal Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak, 1, 34-58. 18. Nachiappan, S. (2014). Gaya bahasa dan proses kognisi: Kaedah pedagogi hermeneutik dan interpretasi. Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Publisher. 19. Nachiappan, S. (2014). Panduan pendidikan awal kanak-kanak: teori, model, kaedah dan aktiviti ke arah perkembangan kognisi. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 20. Nachiappan, S., Jantan, R., & Abdul Shukor, A. A. (2007). Psikologi pendidikan. Shah Alam: Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. 21. Piaget Jean. (1972). The psychology of intelligence. Totowa, NJ Littlefield. 22. Schmidt, M. E., Pempek, T. A., Kirkorian, H. L., Lund, A. F., & Anderson, D. R. (2008). The effects of background television on the toy play behavior of very young children. Child development, 79(4), 1137-1151. 23. Sperry, R.W. (1962). Some general aspects of hemispheric integration In V. B. Mountcastle (Ed.). Interhemispheric relations and cerebral dominance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press. 24. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 25. Stipek, D. (2006). No child left behind comes to preschool. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 455-467. 26. Trumbull, E., & Pacheco, M. (2005). The teacher's guide to diversity: Building a knowledge base. Vol. I: Human development, culture, and cognition. Providence: Brown University.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page